ABSTRACT
Introduction: While there is evidence that persons with MS (pwMS) treated with anti-CD20 are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 and lower levels of antibodies after vaccination, there was no emerging evidence of an effect of alemtuzumab on COVID-19 severity and response to vaccine. However, small samples were analysed. Objective/Aim: To evaluate COVID-19 severity, disease characteristics, and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of pwMS treated with alemtuzumab. Method(s): We evaluated the subgroup of pwMS treated with alemtuzumab enrolled in the nationwide MuSC-19 and CovaXiMS studies. MuSC-19 was a retrospective study of pwMS with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and CovaXiMS was a prospective study evaluating the antibody levels pre- and post-vaccination in pwMS. Result(s): Forty-four pwMS treated with alemtuzumab (mean age 36 years, 71% female, 91% relapsing-remitting MS, mean interval since last infusion 730 days) had COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2021. Seven (16%) were asymptomatic and the rest had mild disease, with no hospitalization nor ventilation required. In the CovaXiMS study, 34 pwMS (mean age 38 years, 74% female, 100% relapsing-remitting MS, mean interval since last infusion 784 days) were last treated with alemtuzumab before the two doses of mRNA vaccine (26 Pfizer, 8 Moderna). Of these, 23 (68%) received their last infusion < 2.5 years before vaccination. The antibody level 4 weeks after the second dose was high (median=4203 U/mL, range=484-8662) and comparable to levels achieved in pwMS treated with other DMTs except anti-CD20 and fingolimod. Antibody levels were not correlated to the time since last alemtuzumab infusion (r=0.14, p=0.42). All had 6 months of follow-up and no breakthrough infections were observed. Conclusion(s): There is no evidence of any increased risk for severe COVID-19 in pwMS treated with alemtuzumab. In these patients, humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was high and comparable to those treated with other DMTs or untreated.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccination induces specific Tand B-cell responses in healthy subjects (HS). In MS patients treated with anti-CD20 drugs, the antibody response is reduced or absent, whereas specific T-cell responses are maintained. It is not known whether and how vaccination affects innate responses mediated by natural killer (NK) cells in HS and in MS patients treated with anti-CD20 drugs. Objective(s): To evaluate whether and how NK cells contribute to the immune response following anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccination in HS and in ocrelizumab-treated MS patients Aims: The aims of this work were: 1) to evaluate the effects of anti-SARS CoV2 vaccination on the phenotype of NK cells from HS and from ocrelizumab-treated MS patients and 2) to evaluate how peptides from the SARS-CoV2 spike protein affect NK cell responses before and after anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccination. Method(s): We enrolled 21 MS patients treated with ocrelizumab and 20 HS. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from peripheral blood and stored under liquid nitrogen. Thawed PBMCs were cultured overnight in presence/absence of SARS-CoV2 peptides or peptides from the cytomegalovirus (CMV), with/without activating cytokines. Phenotype of NK cells through a 13-marker flow cytometry panel and intracellular production of IFN-gamma were evaluated after culture. Result(s): Findings: 1) Vaccination increased the proportion of CD56dim NK cells in HS and MS patients. CD56posCD16neg NK cells, more abundant in MS patients before vaccination, decreased thereafter. Lower pre-vaccination activation capability of NK cells from MS patients compared to HS in response to stimulus with cytokines was reverted by vaccination. 2) Before vaccination, peptides from the SARS-CoV2 protein downregulated the production of IFN- gamma from NK cells of HS, but not ocrelizumabtreated MS patients, who had significantly lower baseline IFN-gamma NK cells 3) After vaccination, peptides from the SARS-CoV2 protein did not affect the production of IFN- gamma from NK cells of HS. Conclusion(s): The results of this work demonstrate anti-SARSCoV2 vaccination increases the proportion of effector CD56dim NK cells in HS and ocrelizumab-treated patients. Spike peptides inhibit the function of NK cells from HS before, but not after vaccination. Such phenomenon may contribute to the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV2 in unvaccinated subjects.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) disease- modifying therapies (DMTs) are known to affect immune response to antigens and possibly to SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Therefore, post-vaccination serological assessments are needed to evaluate the effect of the vaccine on SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. Objectives and aims: We designed a prospective multicenter cohort study enrolling pwMS who were scheduled for SARSCov- 2 vaccination with mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Inc or mRNA-1273, Moderna Tx, Inc) to evaluate their effect on SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. Methods: A blood collection for the measure of SARS-CoV-2 antibody before the first vaccine dose and 4 weeks after the second dose was planned, with a centralized and blinded serological assessment (electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, ECLIA, Roche Diagnostics). Results: Preliminary data were collected on 780 pwMS (76% BNT162b2 and 24% mRNA-1273) who had pre- and 4-week post-vaccination blood assessments. 87 (11.2%) were untreated, 154 (19.7%) on ocrelizumab, 25 (3.2%) on rituximab, 85 (10.9%) on fingolimod, 25 (3.2%) on cladribine and 404 (51.7%) on other DMTs. 677 patients (86.8%) had detectable post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. At multivariate analysis, the antibody levels of patients on ocrelizumab (178-fold decrease, p<0.001), fingolimod (26-fold decrease, p<0.001) and rituximab (17-fold decrease, p<0.001) were significantly reduced as compared to untreated patients. Vaccination with mRNA-1273 resulted in a systematically 3.5-fold higher antibody level than with the BNT162b2 vaccine (p<0.001). Interpretation: In pwMS, anti-CD20 treatment and fingolimod led to a reduced humoral response to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. As mRNA-1273 elicits 3.5-higher antibody levels than BNT162b2, this vaccine may be preferentially considered for patients under anti-CD20 treatment or fingolimod. Combining our data with those that will be produced by studying the cellular immune response to vaccines, and including clinical follow-up, will contribute to better define the most appropriate SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strategies in the context of DMTs and MS. At the time of the ECTRIMS presentation data on the full sample (about 2000 subjects) will be presented.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has raised, among others, a particular concern for people taking immune-suppressants. The Italian MS Foundation (FISM), Neuroimmunology Association (AINI), Neurological Society (SIN), and MS Registry have constituted an Alliance to tackle these issues. In the field of multiple sclerosis, several reports have suggested a higher risk of infection and an increased severity of the disease in persons treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Serological investigations, showing a blunted production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, questioned the usefulness of vaccination in these subjects, without, however, considering T cell responses. Objectives and Aims: To investigate antiviral T cell responses after infection with SARS-CoV-2 in persons with MS (pwMS) treated with Ocrevus.Control groups include pwMS treated with Ocrevus without SARS-CoV-2 infection, persons without MS with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and healthy individuals vaccinated or not with BNT16b2. Methods: Blood samples were collected and processed to isolate PBMCs, that were then stored frozen. PBMCs were stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools and T cell reactivity was assessed by ELISPOT for IFNg detection, and by multiparametric FACS analyses for assessment and characterization of T cell activation. Results: ELISPOT assay against the spike and the N protein of SARS-CoV-2 displayed specific T cell reactivity in 80% pwMS treated with Ocrevus and infected by SARS-CoV-2, similar to infected persons without MS. FACS analysis following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools, showed the presence of activation-induced markers (AIM) in both CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets in 96% and 92% of these individuals, respectively. CD4 AIM+ cells were mostly central and effector memory cells, while CD8 cells were largely CD45RA+ terminally differentiated effectors (TEMRA) and poised for cytotoxicity, with a significant fraction of naïve cells. Within naïve AIM+ CD4 and CD8 cells we detected memory stem cells, suggesting the acquisition of long-term memory and protection from reinfection. COVID-19- recovered pwMS treated with Ocrevus had T cell responses comparable to healthy individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2, particularly concerning the ability to produce cytokines. Conclusions: B-cell depletion using Ocrevus does not impair the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses. Multistakeholder initiatives are mandatory to rapidly obtain unbiased clinically crucial information.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate efficacy and Safety of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (pts) who switched to ocrelizumab (OCR) due to persistence of disease activity after two courses of alemtuzumab (ALM) Background: The management of MS pts who show disease activity after 2 ALM courses represents an unsolved issue Design/Methods: MS patients who switched from ALM to OCR from March 2019 to March 2020 were retro-A nd prospectively recruited from different Italian MS Centers. Clinical, immunological and neuroradiological data about ALM treatment period, ALM-OCR interval and OCR treatment period were collected Results: 23 MS pts [mean age: 35.7(6.8);female, 40.1%;Relapsing Remitting, (RR): 75.8%, active Secondary progressive, (aSP): 24.2%;mean time interval (days) from II ALM course 87.4(108);cumulative number of relapses: 21;mean number of new T2 and Gd+ lesions: 4.1(4.5) and 1.6(3.1);median EDSS:3(range 1-7)]. The mean follow-up (FU) from OCR start: 7.9±7.4 months. 4 (17.4%) pts had a relapse after OCR start (1 during the interval between first and the second OCR infusion and 3 pts after 3, 11 and 15 months from OCR start. 4 (17.4%) pts showed only radiological activity at 3 (n=2), 4 (n=1) and 9 months (n=1). Infusion Associated Reactions occurrence was lower than ALM courses (p<0.05) ;mild upper airways (n=1), urinary infections (n=1), appendicectomy (n=1) and fever due to probable Sars-Cov2 infection (n=1). No pts showed T CD4+ cell count <200 cell/mm3 at 3, 6-months and 1-year FU;B CD19+ cell depletion (<5 cell/mm3) was confirmed at 3, 6-months and 1-year FU with the exception of 1 pt (B CD19+ count 12 cells/mm3 at 6 month FU (n=12 pts)). 10 (43.4%) pts developed hypogammaglobulinemia without infectious events. No ALM-related new complications occurred. Conclusions: Short-term FU suggests that the switch to OCR in MS after 2 ALM courses is characterized by a good safety and efficacy profile.
ABSTRACT
Background: the management of MS patients (pts) who show disease activity after 2 alemtuzumab (ALM) courses represents an unsolved issue. No real-life data about the switch to ocrelizumab (OCR) have been reported yet. Objectives: To describe efficacy and safety outcome of OCR patients switching from ALM due to persistence of disease activity after ALM Methods: MS pts who switched from ALM to OCR from March 2019 to March 2020 were retro- and prospectively recruited from different Italian MS Centers. Clinical, immunological and neuroradiological data about ALM treatment period, ALM-OCR interval and OCR treatment period were collected. Results: we recruited 23 MS pts [mean age: 35.7(SD±6.8);female, 40.1%;Relapsing Remitting, (RR): 75.8%, active Secondary progressive, (aSP): 24.2%;mean time interval (days) from II ALM course: 87.4(SD±108);cumulative number of relapses: 21;mean number of new T2 and Gd+ lesions: 4.1(SD±4.5) and 1.6(SD±3.1);median EDSS:3(range 1-7)]. The mean follow-up (FU) from OCR start was 7.9±7.4 months. Efficacy: 4 (17.4%) pts had a relapse after OCR start (1 pt relapsed between the first and the second OCR infusion and 3 pts after 3, 11 and 15 months from OCR start respectively), with complete recovery after steroid treatment. 4 (17.4%) pts showed radiological activity with no clinical correlates at 3 months (n=2), 4 months (n=1) and 9 months (n=1). EDSS was stable except for 1 aSP patient who showed 1-year disability progression. Safety: I) Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs) occurrence was significantly lower with respect to alemtuzumab courses (p<0.05);(ii) infections: mild upper airways (n=1), urinary infections (n=1), appendicectomy (n=1) and fever due to probable Sars-Cov2 infection (n=1). For 12 pts, data about immunophenotype were available. Of them, no pts showed T CD4+ cell count decrease <200 cell/mm3 at 3, 6-months and 1-year FU;complete B CD19+ cell depletion (<5 cell/mm3) was confirmed at 3, 6-months and 1-year FU. 10 (43.4%) pts developed hypogammaglobulinemia without developing associated infectious events. C) Autoimmunity: no alemtuzumab-related new complications occurred. Conclusions: short-term FU seems to suggest that the switch to OCR in MS patients who showed disease activity after 2 ALM courses is characterized by a good safety and efficacy profile, although clinical and neuroradiological activity can be detected both in an early and in a later phase of treatment. Longer followup is warranted and recruitment is still ongoing.